The Napoleon debate went a little differently then I would
have expected. It was interesting when Sonya and Christine brought up what were
the goals of the revolution. As well those opposed to Napoleon, mentioned all
the negative things like how people were afraid to leave their houses and
Napoleon’s strict police force. In my group, the pro Napoleon group, Aidan did
a terrific job brining up all the interesting and important triumphs of
Napoleon. These included his success in Italy and his ability to create peace
for France. As well my team brought up the key points about how Napoleon saved
the French economy and had a constitution, which most people approved. On the
other side of the debate, the con team mentioned how he severely minimized
women’s rights, which was a step backwards in the revolution. This point was
started and argued very well by Adriana.
Coming back to the pro side, Savannah argued very well in the defense of
Napoleon saying that the revolution died when he was kicked out of France
leaving a king in charge. This was our key argument because Napoleon was the
only person who kept the revolution alive and he saved France. After his
ousting, France was put back into a monarchy placing them at the same state
they were before the revolution began. Overall both sides of the debate had
some very good key points. The overall debate was very interesting and really
helped my understanding of the Napoleonic age.
Even though I was on the "anti" team, I definitely agree with you and Savannah that the revolution died in France with Napoleon because a king replaced him and that a constitution was established (making the revolution continue). Your team did a good job countering our points, especially the ones regarding the freedom of the people and the goals of the Revolution.
ReplyDelete